![]() 3.1 Liberal Principles and the Categorical Approach 3.2 Categories, Rights, and Utility 3.3 Freedom of Expression 3.4 A Perfectionist Defense of. Sanction Utilitarianism 2.11 The Proof of Utility 2.12 The Sanctions of Utility 3. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.įor technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). 2.7 Act Utilitarianism 2.8 Rule Utilitarianism 2.9 Sanction Utilitarianism 2.10 Act vs. If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. You can help adding them by using this form. We have no bibliographic references for this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about. This allows to link your profile to this item. Hare argues that, for most of our moral thinking, we re- fer to rules that we learned during our upbringing. If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:utilit:v:6:y:1994:i:01:p:43-53_00. You can help correct errors and omissions. act and rule utilitarianism he later defended a form of rule uti- litarianism designed to avoid act utilitarianism's implausibilities. All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |